Monday, December 01, 2008

"Pull Down Your Underwear, Turn Around, and Cough Three Times" 

posted by Erik @ 21:28

"On se demande dans quel pays on vit", dit [Vittorio de Filippis, journaliste à Libération, membre de la direction du journal].
The French press is up in arms because a member of Libération has been allegedly mistreated by French police. Arrested at his home in the early hours of dawn for defamation (for "allowing" a website vistor's comment on a controversial businessman to remain on the website), Vittorio de Filippis was brought to the police station and told to get undressed. Then he was directed to lower his underpants… «Baissez votre slip, tournez-vous et toussez trois fois!»

The editor of Le Monde calls the police methods unacceptable but the police say that the Filippis version of events is exaggerrated.

|



Sunday, November 30, 2008

Man bites dog 

posted by Georges @ 15:28

Lawyers seek the creation of a new organisation which helps ensure lawyers are employed.

Film at 11

|



Saturday, November 29, 2008

Your Fungible Freedoms 

posted by Joe Noory @ 11:59

Another way of saying "share the goods, comrade" is all they're capable of coming up with.

It is time to think about how to prepare democratic society for the significant stress that adjusting to climate change will cause, and how to guarantee political participation in a difficult period. In Germany, citizens are already beginning to doubt that they live in the best of all political worlds. According to a study conducted by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, almost one in three people hold the view that democracy is functioning badly; astoundingly, 60 per cent of eastern Germans were of this opinion. There is a growing impression that the political system is not equipped to deal with the "big issues" such as climate change, global justice, and demographic development. In other words, democracy is no longer "delivering" and is lacking an essential pillar of its credibility: output legitimacy.
The fear of vague ecological something-or-other is in the view of the great European minds, just another necessary wedge issue/crobar to carve away at democracy by banal rulemaking and use dirigism and subsidies to place the role of work and industry under state control.

Unremarkable to see that these unremarkable minds also believe that measure to control the runaway march to an absolute welfare state, and any number of class-warfare based complaints are some sort of justification for the dismantling of individual freedoms too.

The lack of importance the individual has to the people who spout these theories, and the casualness with which they discuss investing in central governments something closer to absolute power might seem to make a cliche out of these folks, but it's largely true when you read what they write. It's not wooly-headed to plainly say just how much people like this seem to resign themselves to concepts of governance consistence with dictatorship, and sad to see that they show no scepticism of absolutism and to the end of political pluralism at all. I suppose that like the East German regime they will willing to accept the nominal existence of more than one political party for a few years, so longs as they're all the same.
From communication management to democratic skill

It is not hard to understand that those affected by such situations feel themselves abandoned by the state, and often from democracy as well. One of the main reasons is precisely that the state has not ceased to profess willingness to provide care that in reality it can no longer afford. Thus, for example, the increasingly loud demands that low and middle income groups receive compensation for dramatically rising energy costs are likely to be disappointed. No democracy in the world that can vouch for this if resources become scarcer and therefore more expensive; moreover, if democracies wish to retain trust, paradoxically they must admit that they cannot do so. It is possible to imagine what will happen if rising energy costs result in a decline in living standards even for middle income groups, with low earners no longer able to heat their homes
But to find the true ignorance evident in their view, they cant help but forsee disorder in the public communication of relief measures to salve the people where strict controls are trying to do what free-markets can accomplish without manipulation. In wondering just how it is that central governments will be able to tell those "classes" who will demand relief from the rising cost of energy which will be for their own good, they see a "communication management problem". To translate that into plain language: they see the need to propagandize.
In the search for actors that possess or could acquire democratic skills, the gaze falls less and less upon professional politics. Some see the chance for the revival of social participation in active consumer responsibility; consumer rights lends itself well to learning democratic skills through apparently trivial questions such as: "What can I do so that our school is supplied by the local organic dairy?" According to this approach, analogous issues of climate and environmental protection open up new opportunities for political engagement that connect local and regional agendas with global ones.
That's interesting: they don't sem to want democracy, a social form that permits multiple views, debate, and an environment that permits independant study and opinion. They want people with "visible democratic skills" to all make the same kind of decisions and push for the same kinds of initiatives.

The seeming smallness of their motives is as stunningly ignorant as the unthinking ease with which they will concider such a huge and sweeping disposal of the idea that overbearing and invasive state regulation of society is somehow harmless and inherently good.

You simply could not get any more naive about history or myopic in identifying the scale of the problem that they're telling people that they want to solve. Rampling around for yet more, the credit crisis (naturally "caused by greed",) is mined for yet more proof that what the world needs is a veneer of participatory government, so that the real business of an elite within NGOs making themselves a meal-ticket out of the emotional anxiety of the polulation and a few flawed threds of science can trump all else - private of public.

We've already seen the regurgitation of the notion of "making the new socialist man" by way of the use of guilt over social, political, and environmental matters - benignly in the promotion of "new attitudes and lifestyle" which combine a trained non-resistence to anything that looks like a public stunt for "social-justice", or "saving the earth". I only wonder what other revisions of the discredited authoritarian manifestos have been left out.


|



Friday, November 28, 2008

Gobble, Gobble 

posted by Georges @ 19:10

Thanksgiving Day and American readers of NP are no doubt decidely not huddled around the television and/or the internet waiting for the latest breaking news filling the world. So, when nobody is watching, what better day to drop a turkey:

There is both growing public reluctance to make personal sacrifices and a distinct lack of enthusiasm for the major international efforts now underway to battle climate change, according to findings of a poll of 12,000 citizens in 11 countries, including Canada.
No doubt as well that this ends the year on a sour note for all involved (the poll is listed as commissioned by the Earthwatch Institute). Six to eight months ago there was undoubtedly great hope. Ideas were pitched, proposals were written, funding obtained, meetings held, powerpoints prepared, urgent emails exchanged, questions worked, polling firms contacted, contracts signed, PR strategy created, and joy all around.

Then those bloody proles got involved and ruined everything with their so-called "answers". No screaming headlines in the Guardian, no prominent mention in a Monbiot piece, no banner headlines, no doom and even less gloom. Just a tattered unread press release left on the sidewalk.

Shudder, what will the donors think....

|



Wednesday, November 26, 2008

An entire American culture, the West itself, its ideas and experiences, have simply vanished on the altar of therapy 

posted by Erik @ 22:42

…increasingly to meet a young American male about 25 is to hear a particular nasal stress, a much higher tone than one heard 40 years ago, and, to be frank, to listen to a precious voice often nearly indistinguishable from the female.
Victor Davis Hanson offers up Ten Random, Politically Incorrect Thoughts

|



Tuesday, November 25, 2008

The Crisis that Officially Isn't 

posted by Joe Noory @ 00:42

Brussels Journal reports on an issue that has lit up the French "réacosphere": the idea that a nation with factional, race and ethnicity centered conflict is officially color-blind when society clearly isn't.

The cartoon at the left reads:

So, as I was saying, in France we are all racists. (Except for singers and television).
- I wonder if in foreign countries they are as racist as we are...
- No, I don't think so, seeing as how they're not French.

The cartoon at the right reads:

Unfortunately for us 60 million racists, we are a bit harassed by television.

- I propose a TV series where a girl from Cameroon goes to live in a village and finds she's the target of the villagers' racism, but at the end they see she is OK.

- Yeah, super great idea. They're often racists in the villages. Not like us in the cities.

The big 2 refers to French TV Channel 2

So, as I was saying, in France we are all racists. (Except for singers and television).

- I wonder if in foreign countries they are as racist as we are...
- No, I don't think so, seeing as how they're not French.

The cartoon at the right reads:

Unfortunately for us 60 million racists, we are a bit harassed by television.

- I propose a TV series where a girl from Cameroon goes to live in a village and finds she's the target of the villagers' racism, but at the end they see she is OK.
- Yeah, super great idea. They're often racists in the villages. Not like us in the cities.

The big 2 refers to French TV Channel 2.


|



Monday, November 24, 2008

High noon at the intersection of Realityplatz and Moralitystraße 

posted by Georges @ 12:41

Guess who blinks first:

German Chancellor Angela Merkel faced calls from fellow conservatives Sunday to fight to water down a European Union climate pact until the recession-wracked economy is moving again.

Bavarian premier Horst Seehofer said in an interview with the Bild am Sonntag newspaper that he had written to Merkel calling on her to back away from EU climate protection goals to be approved next month for a time.
Added bonus:

German Economy Minister Michael Glos, also of the Christian Social Union, the Bavarian sister party of Merkel's Christian Democratic Union, agreed that Germany could ill-afford to make a priority of climate protection with the economy hobbled by the global financial crisis.

"It is not the time to burden the economy with excessive environmental targets," he said.

|



Washing down two pizzas with a Diet Coke does not count as "trying" to lose weight 

posted by Georges @ 09:59

If you frequently find yourself at 30,000 feet, good information to have in terms of who not to fly:

Canada's two largest airlines must give disabled and morbidly obese passengers an extra free seat on domestic flights, beginning in January, after the Supreme Court refused yesterday to consider the carriers' appeal of a federal order.
The truly disabled are a different matter entirely. However, the "morbidly obese":

The ruling is expected to benefit would-be travellers like Linda McKay-Panos, a Calgarian who has secured a declaration from the Federal Court of Appeal that she is obese enough to be considered disabled.

Ms. McKay-Panos, executive director of the Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre, said yesterday that she has not travelled on Air Canada since 1997, when she endured a "humiliating" flight in which the airline refused her an extra seat even though "my hips were flowing over the arm rest, my hips were basically on the lap of the person who sat beside me."
How do you think the person sitting next to you felt? If anything it is they who should be protected from flabby fliers oozing over and under the demarcation line known as the arm-rest.

|



Sunday, November 23, 2008

Gosh, really? 

posted by Georges @ 20:17

Those experts, they divine in such a noble fashion:

Banks are anathema to stock-market investors now, but Peter Sorrentino of Huntington Asset Advisors sees that changing, probably around the middle of next year.
Really, what should the collective we buy:

So who does Sorrentino like while they're still cheap?

He's leery of Citigroup.

"I don't know what you're buying with Citi," he said. "I'd rather go with somebody where there's less uncertainty. I like Wells Fargo, I like US Bancorp, I think those are much stronger balance sheets."
Ok:

He's bullish on JPMorgan Chase "That's almost becoming an asset play in and of itself," he noted.
Any surprises in the deck:

Sorrentino owns shares of Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase.
You don't say.... I am guessing US Bancorp is the spread in this baloney sandwich.

|



Strange headline 

posted by Georges @ 16:18

French Socialists in disarray after vote

Wouldn't "perpetually" be a more à propos description?

|



Please Don’t Mention We’re Going Hat in Hand to the Neighbors 

posted by Joe Noory @ 11:57

Sarko the selfish and greedy want the US and Russia to agree to security terms over the subject of… wait for it… Europe. Isn’t it about time Europe guaranteed its’ own damn security for once? Are someones' delusions about the UN not working at the moment?

"As acting EU council president I propose that mid-2009 we gather for instance within the OSCE [Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe] to lay the basis of what might be a future EU security arrangement ...which would of course involve the Russians and the Americans," Mr Sarkozy said, backing an idea originally proposed by his Russian counterpart.

He also expressed his "preoccupation" with Mr Medvedev's threat to deploy short-range missiles in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, on the shores of the Baltic Sea, bordering Poland and Lithuania.
Sound like there is a lot of acting going on, actually – but it’s a shame that that “preoccupation” with the US defending them from missile attack is seen as imperial over-reach by Sarko.
Prague and Warsaw have poured cold water on French calls for a moratorium on a planned US missile shield in Europe, with both capitals saying that president Nicolas Sarkozy overstepped his mandate.

"I don't think that third countries, even such good friends as France, can have a particular right to express themselves on this issue," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Saturday (15 November).

The Polish leader described Mr Sarkozy's comments as his "own point of view, [with] no impact of the future of the project," according to AFP, adding that "The question of the anti-missile shield is governed by an agreement between Poland and the United States."

A similar message came from the Czech republic, with the country's deputy prime minister Alexandr Vondra saying he was taken by surprise.

"France did not discuss its viewpoint with us ... As far as I know, the French presidency mandate for the EU-Russia summit did not contain a position on the US missile defence system," he said.
Of course they wouldn’t discuss the viewpoint with you – they’ve got plans that don’t necessarily include you!


|



Saturday, November 22, 2008

Imaginary News Headline Caption Contest 

posted by Joe Noory @ 23:55



But not quite with THIS image. No, rather what would the headlines of the editorials and "news" items read if that was George Bush, and not Barack Obama with a crowd praying for, with, and perhaps later on with some friends, to him.


|



Friday, November 21, 2008

As the Rest of the World Turns.... 

posted by Joe Noory @ 23:55

Reisen in das Land der Neid und Müdigkeit

As noted previously, a great many Germans, always fond of anti-capitalistic "it's the man's fault" explanations for nearly anything and have managed to let their post O-gasm glow of being freshly ravished last exactly a week. The mags and rags pander to it of course, but amid the sad and outdated cliches we've seen before with cowboys, truckers, cowboys, men in busieness suits (I guess they just don't think they have any of those,) cowboys, locusts, and cowboys... we see that now someone is indulging lefty anarchist-cum-welfare-addict assasination fantasies. Medienkritik:

With Obama, Spiegel and others will no longer be focusing attacks on the American executive (at least in the short-term) as was standard practice under Bush. Instead, as we have previously speculated, they will likely turn to attacking broader aspects of American society (the economic downturn is the current dominant theme) for all that is wrong in the United States and the world. Think World Scapegoat USA. Think pet peeves. Having to respect Obama just makes accomplishing what readers require a bit more demanding.
It makes sense on one level. There appear to be enough Germans found in this survey as Clarsonimus has clued us in on, to live up to their stereotypes - in this case one of being an incredibly miserable bunch of grousers.
How, uh, shocking or something. But, then again, the most shocking thing about the latest study concerning the German nation’s outlook on life in general and democracy in particular isn’t the fact that it is so negative and down and fatalistic and just plain pitiful (their outlook is always that way, otherwise they wouldn’t call themselves Germans - although this time it’s the most negative it’s been for about twenty years or so), no, the most shocking thing about this latest study is that anyone could possibly think to classify it as being news at all.
It's an outlook from that "I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy than have a bottle in front of me school" from which the same adopt the inverse, but that probably isn't important when you've already turned into Morrissey.


|



Barack Obama aurait-il pu être élu en France ? La question agite la France monocolore 

posted by Erik @ 23:53

Could a Barack Obama have been elected in France? asks Philippe Bernard in Le Monde.

|



Regarding Iran, the Europeans No Longer Fear a Too Rigid America But a Too Conciliatory America 

posted by Erik @ 23:46

What is most surprising about the Europeans' initial interactions with Barack Obama, writes Daniel Vernet in Le Monde, is a warning not to get too cozy with the Iranian régime.
C'est là qu'on voit que les temps ont changé. On n'est plus à l'ère de George W. Bush et des soupçons d'interventionnisme irréfléchi. De la part des Etats-Unis, les Européens ne craignent plus une attitude trop rigide mais trop conciliante. Les idées de M. Obama à propos d'un dialogue "sans conditions" avec Téhéran les inquiètent.

…les trois Européens sont payés pour savoir que les Iraniens sont maîtres dans l'art de gagner du temps sans rien concéder. Mais rien n'indique que le président élu et son entourage n'en soient pas tout aussi conscients.
In other words, what the always-more-lucid-than-thou Europeans always fear (Bush or no Bush) is… a clueless America. In one direction or the other.

|



In the Middle East, the American soldier is an inspiring and worthy heir to those who liberated France and Europe 

posted by Erik @ 15:57

Who are they, those soldiers from across the Atlantic, what is their daily life like, and what support do they bring to the men of our OMLT on a daily basis?
asks Merlin, a French soldier in Afghanistan.
…what impressive warriors they are! We have not come across any bad ones, as strange at it may seem to you when you know how critical French people can be.

…And combat ? If you have seen Rambo you have seen it all - always coming to the rescue when one of our teams gets in trouble, and always in the shortest delay. That is one of their tricks : they switch from T-shirt and sandals to combat ready in three minutes. Arriving in contact with the enemy, the way they fight is simple and disconcerting : they just charge !

…We seldom hear any harsh word, and from 5 AM onwards the camp chores are performed in beautiful order and always with excellent spirit. A passing American helicopter stops near a stranded vehicle just to check that everything is alright; an American combat team will rush to support ours before even knowing how dangerous the mission is - from what we have been given to witness, the American soldier is an inspiring and worthy heir to those who liberated France and Europe.

|



Au Moyen-Orient, le soldat américain est un beau soldat, digne héritier de ceux qui libérèrent la France et l’Europe 

posted by Erik @ 15:47

Qui sont-ils, ces soldats d’outre Atlantique, quel est leur quotidien et quel soutien apportent-ils quotidiennement à nos hommes des OMLT ?
demande Merlin, soldat français en Afghanistan dans une observation personnelle et "from the field" qui contredit quelque peu les descriptions superlatives, apocalyptiques, et hystériques de la presse de l'Hexagone (la guerre est un "désastre", le soldat américain "a peur", la "tragédie" du quotidien) depuis le confort de leurs bureaux à Paris.
…quels soldats ! Nous n’en avons pas croisé de mauvais. Etrange quand on sait combien nous savons être critiques !

Et au combat me direz-vous ? Si vous avez vu RAMBO vous avez tout vu : toujours présents pour se porter à la rescousse quand une de nos équipes se trouve dans le pétrin, et toujours dans des délais très brefs. C’est un de leur secret : ils passent de la tenue claquette T-shirt à la tenue de combat en trois minutes, et arrivés à proximité de la position ennemie leur mode d’action est simple et déroutant : ils foncent !

…Ici, rarement un mot plus haut que l’autre, et dès 5 heures du matin les travaux d’intérêts généraux se font dans le plus bel ordre et sans jamais rechigner. Bref, de ce qui nous a été donné de voir, de l’hélicoptère de passage qui s’arrête à côté d’un véhicule en panne pour savoir si tout va bien aux sections de combat qui se portent en appui des nôtres avant même de savoir si la mission est périlleuse, le soldat américain est un beau soldat, digne héritier de ceux qui libérèrent la France et l’Europe.

|



Leftist Promises: Why Europe Doesn't Work Anymore 

posted by Erik @ 15:38



(A handout to François)

|



In Defense of Pornography 

posted by Erik @ 15:28

Funny. When it comes to X-rated movies and triple-X stores in neighborhoods, leftists say it is protected speech, they point to the First Amendment, etc…

Then we must not judge; then pornography is okay.

When it comes to talk radio, suddenly that is when "pornography" becomes something despicable (a four-letter word, so to speak).

Then suddenly, we are able to judge; then pornography is not okay.

|



A David-versus-Goliath tale 

posted by Erik @ 14:59

The success of California's Proposition 8 was truly a David-versus-Goliath tale
writes Ben Duffy as he discusses "a number of unexamined assumptions and a slew of overtly prejudicial language" as well as "sucker-punching democracy".
The traditional marriage movement stood up to the judges, the California attorney general, the newspapers, the religious Left and the governor to win a major victory in the on-going culture war. … It's game over, right?

Not quite. This is where the shadiness of the homosexual lobby becomes blatant cheating.

|



Death Cab for Goofy 

posted by Joe Noory @ 00:50

Aw. Idn’t dat cute... Clearstream. Again.

Former prime minister faces trial in France

Villepin is accused of engineering the dissemination of a fake list of secret accounts at Clearstream that appeared to link several French politicians, including Sarkozy, to kickbacks from the sale of navy frigates to Taiwan in 1991.
Being the revised version of the warrior-poet-king ain’t what it used to be in EUtopia since the great protector of the realm bit has been reduced to a complex involving pacifism and bribing officials to permit arms peddling.


|



Thursday, November 20, 2008

Dans quelle société saine un nouveau venu peut-il sceller une amitié avec de parfaits inconnus en répandant sa haine sur un peuple du monde? 

posted by Erik @ 15:36

In Swirtzerland, writes Stéphane
— and I am ready to bet upon it, in most parts of Europe — in 2008, to integrate oneself, one has to be anti-American.
Meanwhile, Davids Medienkritik asks, Will Anti-Americanism Disappear in German Media now that Obama is President?

|



Birth Dearth of a Nation 

posted by Joe Noory @ 00:04

People continue to ask: “who are the citizens of Europe?” Well, to begin with, it’s people from non-member states that are trying the hardest to get in, while the actual citizens are trying very hard to avoid history altogether and be a non-nation. Non-confederacy extended to anything that actually IS the role of the state (foreign policy, legal justice, defence,) while the EU itself is preoccupied by standards that can be set by industries themselves, and trying to look like they’re filling the potholes and building roads – the precise opposite of any sane definition of governance.

Then again, what do you expect? The European world-view seeks global (outsourced) governance in nearly anything that matters – so long as it’s own ideas can be injected in it and imposed on others. Such is what we find with the misperseption with the idea that the American view of free markets asn the European notion of “social markets” (whatever that is this week,) both have an impact on reversing the global economic downturn. They don’t. Arguing that point will not recapitalize banks, all it could do is change the practices in the future.

They just make one think that governance is doing something tangible, and appear to be responding to the call for someone to do “something… anything.” The confusion is permanent. From the EU Observer we discover just how fevered their minds really are when they refer to internal matters under the heading of “Global Governance”:

"The World Trade Organisation should be taken as a positive example of global governance," the 20 chambers said in a statement.

Meanwhile, the Socialist grouping in the European Parliament on Thursday issued a five-point plan from Manchester where their MEPs had been having a strategising pow-wow, for a rebuilding of the world financial system and how to boost the economy.

Their "Manchester Declaration", is a largely Keynesian document, calling for a European green investment package to put money in people's pockets and make the shift to a low-carbon economy, targetting in particular vulnerable households and small businesses.

The left-of-centre MEPs call for much greater levels of intergovernmental co-ordination and public spending.

"The European Union has a key role to play in raising and channelling funds. There should be no taboo," said French Socialist MEP Pervenche Berès, chair of the European Parliament's economic and monetary affairs committee. "The member states should discuss the possibility of the EU issuing Eurobonds to invest in European projects."
Further to that confusion is what the NGO groupies outside are saying about the very idea that personal economic behavior can be dictated:
"Let's call time on global greed," they continued. "The same systems that create poverty here – unfair trade rules and tax systems, debt burdens, privatisation and attacks on welfare spending – also create poverty in the developing world."
Good luck. Since there has never been a suuccessful economic recovery that didn't involve a reduction of trade rules, taxes, employer mandates, and public borrowing, we can see what the critic there is really looking for: some supernatural corection to whatever is historically true. Proof that the left's ideas, however bad they are, must be made to seem a success at any cost.

Wow, I say.


|



Wednesday, November 19, 2008

They've Been Holding Back. Think of all the Misery his Brilliance could have Spared Humanity 

posted by Joe Noory @ 00:06

I really can't wait for this Hamas "Scientist" to start treating people for AIDS based on his own assertions.

Ahmad Al-Muzain: "The Prophet Muhammad said: 'If a fly falls into your drink, you should dip it in the drink, and then dispose of the fly, because one of its wings bears a disease, and the other wing bears the cure.' This hadith was included in the Al-Bukhari collection. This hadith makes it absolutely clear that the Prophet Muhammad confirmed a clear scientific fact: If a fly falls into a vessel - before a person drinks from this vessel, he should dip the fly in his drink, before disposing of it. Then he should drink the beverage, because it won't do him any harm. Why? Because one of the fly's wings bears the disease, and the other one bears the cure.
Man, he's right out there on the bleeding edge of frontier of knowledge, isn't he?
"Bayer... Derived Great Benefit from [This Study]... To Treat AIDS"

"When Bayer, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, learned about this study, it derived great benefit from it. It established biological breeding farms, where they raised flies and extracted antibiotics from their wings - the strongest antibiotics in the whole world. This antibiotic was made into a course of five pills, which is given to the patients, and it is used - believe it or not, my brothers - to treat AIDS patients. It strengthens their immune system, and destroys all types of microbes with which they are afflicted. This is all thanks to the power of this antibiotic. Obviously, this antibiotic is very expensive, and one course costs more than $500, but it is very strong and effective. How did they discover it? From this hadith." [...]
Actual facts or connections obviously not needed.


|

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. // AVIS : En vertu de l'article L. 122-5 du Code de Propriété Intellectuelle, ce site Internet peut contenir des citations dont l'usage n'aura pas reçu l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. La présentation de ces citations se fait dans le but de faciliter la découverte de divers sujets politiques, économiques, scientifiques, sociaux, artistiques, médiatiques ou encore culturels. L'article L. 122-5 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle dispose et autorise « les analyses et courtes citations justifiées par le caractère critique, polémique, pédagogique, scientifique ou d'information de l'oeuvre à laquelle elles sont incorporées ». A contrario, les emprunts qui excéderont les dispositions du « droit de citation », devront obtenir l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur.